“Then you must do exactly what I say.”
Friday, 11 March 2011
Do you like Aunty Jane?
“Then you must do exactly what I say.”
Wednesday, 2 March 2011
The Birdwatcher’s Guide to Twitter: More Basic Species Identification -
With her jaunty colouring, and curious demeanour, the Robin is the nation’s favourite twitter species. Instantly recognisable, she was a household name well before twitter was a twinkle in Jack Dorsey’s eye. .
The Robin is just as happy tugging worms from the gardens of the rich and famous as from the scrubland behind the gasworks. Ordinary and trivial one minute, funny and loud the next, her chirp is a pleasure to listen to. With no need to market herself, she’s free simply to be herself. Alas, though, not such a pleasure to write about, but proof, if proof were needed, that the kind and nice are much harder to make interesting than the nasty and grim. So, moving swiftly on...
For previously spotted twitter species, the Blue Footed Booby, the Mother Hen and the Peacock, click here.
Monday, 21 February 2011
The Birdwatcher’s Guide to Twitter: Basic Species Identification
#1 The Blue Footed Booby
Twitter is the Blue Footed Booby's natural habitat. Twitter is their sky, their nesting site, their feeding ground. Commonly spotted with upwards of 45,000 followers they are prone to follow nearly all of them back. They check their twitter ranking on a hourly basis, squawking with panic if they find themselves below the top twenty.
An inherent self-publicist, the Booby is nevertheless liable to misfire occasionally (see picture). No randomly snapped iphoto, the Booby profile picture is a thoughtfully lit, digitally enhanced, suggestively posed portrait, closely akin, and often mistaken for, Viagra Spam.
The Blue Footed Booby is a scavenger, happiest when rooting around in other birds' left-overs, tweeting photographs of animals dressed up in silly clothes, light-weight, feel-good, psuedo-philosophical observations, and tit-bits from YouTube. Occasionally it may be spotted in its own habitat, exhibiting itself and its mate at play, almost unwatchable even by the most voyeuristic of twitcher.
The Blue Footed Booby might look like one of nature's anomalies, but it is as indispensible to the twitter ecosystem as plankton is to the sea, bacteria to the compost heap and guano to Peru.
#2 Mother Hen
The main function of this twitter species is to keep us up to date with the minute workings of their family’s timetable. A preliminary identification is often made through the twitter name, which may include a mothering reference, often self-deprecating. In lesser members of the species, there will be reference to parenthood in the profile.
The male of the species also tweets about his children, but ironically, commenting wryly on how clumsily he’s managing all on his own. The female reports her day to day life; the male tends to display new manhood.
Mother hen is not bothered about numbers of followers, preferring instead to congregate with the like-minded, or the actually liked, fellow mother hens living within a 2 mile radius, and usually integral to her child-minding or after school arrangements, many of which arrangements she makes, confirms and alters publicly on twitter.
Apart from these practical communications, the mother hen's distinctive call takes the form of twitpics of messy meals, advice on how to get wax crayon off walls, and ideas on where to go in half term.
#3 The Peacock
The peacock shares many characteristics with the Blue Footed Booby, but a quick glance at its follower numbers will confirm a genuine sighting. Size matters to the peacock – the size of the ratio. The peacock will be followed by far more than he follows, by at least 5 to 1, and growing. The ratio reflects the way the peacock sees his life generally. Put simply, the peacock considers himself more interesting to others, than others are interesting to him.
The peacock has a flamboyant profile, boasting several high calibre accomplishments, though a quick sift through his website indicates that his greatest gift is of the gab.
Fiercely territorial, the peacock is very particular whom he follows. The hopeful disciple must be a) famous, b) in the top 100 tweeters, c) likely to be useful in the peacock’s career, or d) a close relation. Being amusing, pleasant, having met him once or twice, or trying to make it in the same field, will get you nowhere. Especially trying to make it in the same field.
The peacock’s call is instantly recognisable - a mewing screech of social engagements, even more bigged-up accomplishments, reminders of invitation-only social events, name-dropping descriptions the next day of what fun was had, all interspersed with detailed and self-pitying accounts of the latest bout of peacock flu.
Binoculars at the ready for the Bird of Paradise, the Robin and the Ostrich, coming soon. Sightings and observations of your own most welcome.
Friday, 18 February 2011
Mr Moon's Trip to Evreux
Monday, 14 February 2011
Back When Valentine's Day Meant Something
Exactly a year after our wedding, my first husband announced that he wanted to leave me. There wasn’t anyone else; we were getting along quite well, or at least it seemed that way to me. He just didn’t think being married was the way he wanted to go. A bit like he’d thought sage green would be nice for the sitting room curtains, but once they were hung he decided that orange would go better with the carpet; or, after ordering an extra large pizza he’d realised he wasn’t that hungry after all and wished he’d gone for Regular.
The fact was that he’d made up his mind. His reasons were straightforward. He wanted to be a successful lawyer, and a wife ringing him in the evening, wanting to know when he’d be back, was interrupting his concentration. I’m not being sarcastic when I say I can see how that could have been very annoying. No, really, I’m not. He didn’t see any point talking about it. He knew it was the right thing to do.
So, he packed his bags and left the next weekend, right? Wrong. He said he'd move out over the May bank holiday. Which would have been pretty normal sounding if the original decision had been made in April, or even March, or even January, at a pinch. But this was the end of September. So between the announcement and the actual move, we had to get through the clocks going back, and the weather getting colder, and Christmas, and my birthday, and then, just over the half way mark, Valentine’s Day.
I like to have a bit of time to get used to things, too. I mean, I’m not one to exchange contracts and complete a house purchase on the same day. I only buy from shops with a liberal returns policy. But seven months is a long time to live with someone who’s decided their vows don’t count any more. It was a small house too, there wasn’t much room. I didn’t like to tell people, it was just a bit too weird. I could have thrown his stuff onto the pavement, but it wasn’t my style. And on top of that, property values were exploding under Nigel Lawson’s bubble and I was hoping for an amicable settlement.
So, Valentine’s Day. He asked me if I’d like to go out for a meal, to celebrate. To celebrate what? To celebrate Valentine’s Day. Better than mooching about at home thinking about what everyone else is doing. Possibly. Okay, I said.
The restaurant was packed with couples, of course, and as if he had picked up some subliminal communication, the waiter seated us in the darkest, hottest, noisiest corner and then apparently forgot all about his intuitive perception and presented me with a single red rose. It wasn’t funny. It was awful. Everyone else was enjoying themselves, that was obvious, holding hands, smiling, laughing, looking into each other’s eyes, feeding each other morsels of pudding, licking the spoon clean, all that kind of carry on. And then us. Not touching, not looking at each other, not speaking. Not even eating. I left the rose on the table, instead of a tip.
The weeks that followed were simpler somehow. For a start, there weren’t that many of them left. The weather got better. We discussed what we’d do about the house. I planned a holiday with some friends. I began to look forward to May which has always been my favourite month.
The next Valentine’s day I made a collage from pieces of fabric. Two figures, a girl and a boy; his trousers were tartan wool and his shirt was pink linen; she had a red corduroy skirt a blouse of Liberty lawn and they were holding hands. The year after, I did the same card but the girl standing sideways, so you could see she was pregnant, and the year after there was a little girl between them. Then I got too busy to make cards, what with that baby and another one, and everything. Now the kids get Valentine's cards, and go out for dinner with their girl friends and boyfriends, squashed in with all the other couples, demonstrating, mourning, escaping, chasing, celebrating their love.
Funny, I rarely think about my first husband. I know he thinks about me even less, because a few years ago I came across someone who'd met him. This person told me he'd once shared a long car journey with my ex-husband and been treated to his entire life story. There'd been no mention of a wife. I think about him easily. I'm not bitter or sad or cross, just very glad he did what he did. Otherwise, just imagine, I might still be hanging on to Valentine's Day.
Monday, 18 January 2010
Katia's Eviction from Celebrity Big Brother
It’s not hard to see why Katia was invited in. Having had no career to speak of, and reportedly dreaming of becoming a children’s illustrator, she was to fulfil the role of very young, very pretty, very naive girl who will inevitably be hit on by one or more of the men. She played it beautifully. Katia is a nymph, if not quite a nymphette, famous only for having come to the amorous attention of the rather less lovely Ron Wood, the rich, married, old, former member of the Rolling Stones.
So, this young girl, almost a child, who has no celebrity career behind her, is put in a house comprised largely of established performers, egotistical men and women many of whom have age and experience on their side, confidence, fans, an understanding of where they have come from and an idea of where they want to go. She ends up with one of those men. He seems a nice enough person, seems to genuinely like her, they are sweet together. So what’s the problem, why the big condemnation, why all the boos?
Three reasons: first, she is said to have a boyfriend outside. Well, excuse me, but that didn’t seem so much of a problem for Preston when he fell for Chantelle and his previous relationship was a lot longer established than Katia and her boyfriend’s couple of weeks.
Second: she’s so boring, she’s dull, not a team player. It’s true that some characters make less good telly than others, but that’s hardly a reason to pillory them; she’s not the only person in the house with the yawn factor, and she’s certainly not the first since the idea was launched.
Third: she fell for the guy that seduced her. A day or two later, she told him she wanted out but went back into his bed. Okay, this didn’t look good, but hang on a minute. The girl is 21 and it was exactly what the guys, Vinny, Alex, and Jonas had suggested, sitting on their beds, offering their smug advice.
I was embarrassed, frankly, at the response to her eviction. Davina, normally so charming, so appropriate, acted like a bully, reprimanding her in front of millions, ticking her off for doing exactly what she’d been paid to do. Let’s wait till her kids, at 17 or 18 or 19 make poor choices, get into situations that they are simply too young and inexperienced to manage, how would she like them to be held up to the condemnation of the nation at peak Friday evening viewing? The Sun journalist on the follow up programme - edged away from Katia, offering his sanctimonious condemnation – he liked Jo Wood, he explained. It’s hard to imagine that little Katia had more influence in the break up of that marriage than Ron Wood. He was the one that was married, afterall and let’s not underestimate the pull of charisma, the allure of his lifestyle, the power of his money.
Katia did extremely well to stand up to the bites and snipes of Friday night. CBB put her in the house as a helpless young girl whom they could be sure at least one of the men wouldn’t be able to resist. To put the onus on her to withstand that pressure, is not just unfair, it’s blatantly sexist. If she had turned the men away she would be condemned as a prick tease, and what else had she to offer in that group of egos all desperate for attention? Her unfortunate adventure in the house demonstrates a lot more about the wiles and vices of the Big Brother industry, and our miserable willingness to put the woman to the stake, than what we already know about the kind of scrapes that pretty young girls can end up in. I’m glad the programme is on the way out.
Monday, 16 March 2009
The Price of Booze
You live in West Sussex and you drink a bottle of vodka a day. You are depressed, your relationship has ended, your wife, who you are in the process of separating from, is sleeping with your best friend, you miss you kids. You get more depressed. One day, in November you are driving to visit friends. You have a bottle of Vodka in the car because you know you won't be able to manage the night without it. Suddenly you find you can't manage the drive without it. You pull over, turn off the engine and drink it. Your son, who is in the back, is terrified, and rings your ex partner. She calls the police and you are arrested.
The system swings into action, only trouble is, it's the criminal justice system, not the health care system. You are charged with refusing a breathyliser and resisting arrest. By the time the magistrates consider the case, you have been to the doctor; she signs you off work with depression. You are definitely depressed. She refers you to the hospital to deal with detox. You admit you have a problem with alcohol. A bottle of vodka a day. The magistrates recognise you are ill, and that you want to get better; they ban you for driving for six months and wish you well in your recovery. You want to start your recovery the next day. You go back to the doctor. She tells you again she's referred you to the hospital. How long will it take to get an appointment, you say. She can't say. The hospital won't tell you either. You see the agency, Ad Action, who tell you that if you come off the drink it is likely to make you ill, so you carry on drinking, though you manage to bring it down to a bottle or two of wine. You don't qualify for rehab because no one, other than yourself is damaged by your drinking.
You go back to the doctor. You still want to stop drinking, but you are afraid and unable to manage it on your own. You also want to go back to work, you are running out of money. You go to AA. They tell similar stories. You wait until a sponsor comes available. That could be weeks - months. Lots of people need sponsors. All this time, your ex wife is making it difficult for you to see the kids. You hate that, it's making you worse, but you know it's probably justified. You've reduced the alcohol to a bottle a day, but it's still using up all your money.
Eventually it's six months since the breakdown, still no appointment from the hospital to help with detox, so you decide to give up the drink on your own. What the Ad Action man said happens. You have a seizure, then another. An ambulance takes you to hospital, where they give you some drugs. You are relieved that something is happening. Then you go nuts. You don't know where you are - everyone is out to get you. You are alone. You will never see your children again. You leave the hospital. Your children are at the end of a dark tunnel, you can't reach them. The hospital say they can't keep the bed unless you go back. You go back, but you can't remember why you are there and leave again. This time your behaviour is threatening. The hospital call the police. They take you to the cells. You have no idea why you feel so ill or why you are there. No one, nothing makes any sense. They can't section you because you are not mentally ill. You are experiencing DT. They send you back to hospital, but the hospital can't keep you there because you haven't been sectioned. You are confused, you try to leave, the police pick up up again. You might have permanent brain damage now, you will find out about that later. Your family watch helpless as this happens. They say that if you'd been given the appointment at the hospital, or given rehab, rather than left to contintue drinking for six months and counting before trying to stop the drink on your own, you would have been okay. If you could think straight, you'd agree with them. Stopping the drink, when you've been heavily addicted, is dangerous. You can see that now. It's life-threatening. It also hurts, it's agony. So the best thing seems to be to carry on drinking. Except the goverment, you hear, are putting a few pence on the bottles. Hhmmn, let me see, you say to yourself. The booze has gone up in price. Do I risk a stroke, seizures, brain damage to save myself a few bob, or do I carry on? Madness lies both ways.






